Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
BACKGROUND: The RESORCE-III trial demonstrated that advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients who progressed on sorafenib and had second-line therapy with regorafenib improved overall survival compared with placebo. Later, immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) combined with antiangiogenetic antibodies has evolved as the preferred first-line treatment for fit patients. We aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of regorafenib as a first-line agent alone or in combination with ICIs in patients with advanced HCC. METHODS: We identified 50 patients with advanced HCC treated with regorafenib as a first-line agent. Two patients were lost to follow-up and excluded. Baseline factors, dosing, concomitant use of ICIs, toxicity and outcome of treatment were recorded from electronic medical records. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients received regorafenib as monotherapy and twenty-two received regorafenib + ICI in combination. In the total cohort, the median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 7.7 months and the median overall survival (mOS) was 16.7 months (P=0.02). Objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) assessed by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 were 21% and 73%. In the regorafenib monotherapy group, mPFS was 5.9 months, and mOS was 13.9 months; in the combination group, mPFS was 7.8 months, and mOS was 23.6 months. ORR and DCR were 15% and 65% in the monotherapy group, and 27% and 82% in the combined treatment group, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Regorafenib used in combination with ICIs had a mild safety profile and resulted in improved response and an almost doubling of mOS compared to monotherapy, warranting further prospective evaluation in a randomized study.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Jianfa Yu
Yi Bai
Zilin Cui
Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Nankai University
Aalborg University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Yu et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68e66dd2b6db6435875f9258 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/jgo-24-315
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: