Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Examining structural safety requires hypotheses on several properties of the bridge structure, such as material properties, boundary conditions, and self-weight. The traditional approach relies on conservative assumptions for each structural property, following the conventional new-design approach. Nonetheless, this approach leads to conservative evaluations of the bridge capacity and may lead to the erroneous conclusion that the structure is deficient. Over-conservatism in structural safety assessments may have large environmental and economic impacts on global infrastructure management. A more advanced approach is to conduct multiple tests and monitoring activities on the structural system to provide more accurate values of these bridge properties. This paper presents a methodology to determine several parameters, including the structural stiffness, the boundary conditions, and the self-weight of concrete bridges based on static and dynamic load testing and robust data-interpretation techniques. The methodology is used on a prestressed concrete bridge in Switzerland. This bridge from 1958 has a single span of 35 meters. Prior to monitoring, conservative evaluations (using the conventional approach) led to the conclusion that the bridge has structural deficiencies. After monitoring, the bridge demonstrates significant reserve capacity, mostly due to the reduction of the self-weight safety factor. This study shows the potential of monitoring techniques for more sustainable and economic infrastructure management.
Bertola et al. (Sat,) studied this question.