Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
In recent years, linguopragmaticians have sought to make predictions as to why and how politicians resort to certain communicative behaviours, hence the focus of linguistic research. Drawing upon parliamentary discourses of Conservative Prime Ministers David Cameron, Theresa May, Boris Johnson and Labor Party leaders Jeremy Corbyn and Keir Starmer, this article aims to develop a new approach to naming communicative behavioral patterns of modern British politicians. The commonality of domestic political tasks faced by the politicians, namely the UK’s exit from the European Union, environmental agenda, migration reform, healthcare system troubles, have predetermined the choice of certain types of ‘communicative personality’ and, consequently, a selection of lexical means used by the politicians during parliamentary debates. The algorithm for typologizing the communicative behavior of politicians includes creating a corpus of utterances and analyzing it through the content analysis program Sketch Engine. A comparison of the most frequent lexical units used by a politician in given communicative situations have made it possible to identify prevailing types of ‘communicative personality’ and key intentions realized in the course of political communication.
Mukhortov et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: