Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) with nivolumab (NIVO) subcutaneous (SC) or intravenous (IV) in patients (pts) with advanced or metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) who have received prior therapy in the phase 3 CheckMate 67T trial.

4535 Background: NIVO IV has improved outcomes in multiple tumor types. Evolving treatment paradigms have created a need for administration options that address treatment burden and improve efficiencies of healthcare systems. In a phase 1/2 study (CheckMate 8KX), pts were highly satisfied with NIVO SC and preferred it over NIVO IV Lonardi et al, ESMO 2022; Lonardi et al, SITC 2023. CheckMate 67T (NCT04810078) is a multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase 3 study that demonstrated pharmacokinetic and objective response rate noninferiority of NIVO SC vs IV in pts with locally advanced or metastatic ccRCC George et al, ASCO-GU 2024. This exploratory analysis assessed non-inferiority of HRQoL between pts randomized to NIVO SC (n=248) vs NIVO IV (n=247) in CheckMate 67T. Methods: HRQoL was measured using patient-reported outcomes (PROs), FKSI-19 (kidney cancer-related HRQoL) and the EQ-5D-5L (pt’s health status). FKSI-19 total score (range 0-76, higher score better HRQoL)and EQ-5D-5L visual analogue scale (VAS) (range 0-100, higher score better health HRQoL) scores were evaluated longitudinally on-treatment visits with ≥10 pts per arm included in model week 57) using linear mixed models (constrained longitudinal data analysis), with least squares (LS) mean changes from baseline and differences in the LS mean between NIVO SC and NIVO IV assessed; non-inferiority of NIVO SC vs NIVO IV was evaluated by examining overall treatment differences for on-treatment visits relative to prespecified thresholds. Results: PRO data were available for 247 pts (99.6%) for NIVO SC and 245 pts (99.2%) for NIVO IV, with completion rates >87% across instruments up to week 57 for both treatment arms. HRQoL was maintained over time for both NIVO arms for FKSI-19 total score and subscales and EQ-5D-5L VAS. NIVO SC was non-inferior to NIVO IV across FKSI-19 total score and subscales and EQ-5D-5L VAS (Table). Conclusions: These results demonstrate maintenance of HRQoL for pts with advanced or metastatic ccRCC while on treatment with NIVO, regardless of the mode of administration (SC or IV), supporting the use of NIVO SC as a new option to align with patient preferences. Clinical trial information: NCT04810078 . Table: see text