Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Earthquake damage to engineering structures often occur in near-fault areas. Near-fault ground motion is characterized by high-energy velocity pulses, long action period, and strong destructiveness. This paper forces on the seismic analysis of a multi-tower super high-rise building that subjected to near-fault ground motions. The interactions between each tower makes the internal forces and dynamic responses much complex and totally different from single-tower super high-rise buildings. However, currently, multi-tower buildings in China are usually regarded as multiple single-tower buildings, and then separately designed based on the relevant provisions in seismic code for single-tower buildings. The mutual influence between the towers is almost not taken into account. Seismic response history analysis was carried on a three-tower super high-rise building using finite element method. Various near-fault and far-fault ground motions and high-energy velocity pulses were used as inputs. Through calculation of inter-story drift ratio and maximum displacement, the quantitative seismic fragility analysis was conducted for the main tower and sub-tower structures. The results show that the responses from near-fault ground motions to the structure are much greater than those from far-fault ground motions. The damage probabilities of various damage levels for near-fault ground motions are 12.5% higher than far-fault ground motions averagely. A further analysis reveals that the velocity pulses are the main factor causing structural damage in near-fault ground motions.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Xingliang Ma
Zhen Liu
Xingyuan Xiao
Journal of Earthquake Engineering
Shandong Institute of Business and Technology
Changzhou Institute of Technology
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Ma et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68e625c9b6db6435875b7c6a — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2024.2373416