Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
This paper delves into the contrasting concepts of judicial activism and judicial restraint within the framework of the Indian judiciary. It provides a historical perspective on their evolution and influence, and then undertakes a comprehensive examination of their impact on the Indian legal system, democratic governance, and judicial legitimacy. Through an analysis of seminal cases and scholarly perspectives, this paper seeks to elucidate the delicate equilibrium that must be maintained between judicial activism and restraint for the effective functioning of India's legal and political institutions.
Savita Sharma (Fri,) studied this question.