Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
We examine Australia's aged care system to understand how the accountability architecture was shaped by outsourcing and explore the resulting implications for service outcomes. We conceptualize quality service provision as a boundary object – i.e. an idea, information, or other mechanism of governance – shared by stakeholders potentially with differing meanings across sites. We highlight NFPs' emphasis on regular reporting with a compliance focus and muted outcome-based accountability. This accountability deficit was masked by the multi-layered principal–agent relationships. The study suggests the need for integrating outcome-based performance monitoring mechanisms of the state with those of outsourced service sites.
Hettiarachchi et al. (Tue,) studied this question.