Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
The increasing extent of greenhouse gas emissions has necessitated the development of techniques for atmospheric carbon dioxide removal and storage. Various techniques are being explored for carbon storage including geological sequestration. The geological sequestration has various avenues such as depleted oil and gas reservoirs, coal-bed methane reservoirs, and mafic and ultramafic rocks. Different trapping mechanisms are in play in these subsurface storage systems. In these sequestration sites, the mafic and ultramafic rocks are best suited for long-term and effective sequestration as they comprise minerals, conducive for chemical alteration, forming stable carbonates. However, these sites often suffer from distinct disadvantages of injectivity issues due to their low permeability and porosity. This study investigates the potential of sequestration in the rock samples obtained from one such site located in India. The rock samples are first characterized using various techniques including X-ray fluorescence, X-ray diffraction, Raman spectroscopy, and field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM). The mineralogical characterization shows that the rock sample contains approximately 10% of diopside. The samples were put in the reactor chamber comprising CO2, which were then investigated using FESEM analysis. Additionally, a reservoir block simulation using commercial software was conducted with the representative minerals in the sample to evaluate the CO2 sequestration potential. The simulation result suggests the formation of magnesite which corresponds to a major part of CO2 mineral trapping. The reduced injectivity due to low porosity and permeability in this rock can be addressed using hydraulic fracturing. The geomechanical behavior of the rock sample for hydraulic fracturing is studied using the Brazilian disc test. The Monte Carlo-based uncertainty analysis was conducted using the tensile strength data of the sample. Results suggest that the most likely fracturing pressure is 2100 psi for this rock sample.
Saif et al. (Tue,) studied this question.