Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
To overcome the significant volume expansion issue encountered by traditional silicon anodes in lithium‐ion batteries, this study employs chemical etching techniques to treat aluminum–silicon alloys of various ratios, successfully preparing three types of porous silicon electrode materials with different pore structures. Through a series of electrochemical tests, this article investigates the role of porous silicon structures in improving electrode performance. The results demonstrate that the porous silicon anodes exhibit superior cycle stability and rate capability compared to traditional solid silicon anodes. This confirms the effectiveness of the porous structure in mitigating the significant volume expansion during the charge and discharge process of silicon materials and in preventing premature electrode failure, thereby significantly enhancing the electrode's cycle life. Remarkably, the porous silicon with a high porosity rate shows exceptionally outstanding performance. Additionally, using computer simulations, this study also models the impact of changes in pore size within the porous silicon material at different states of charge and discharge on the stress distribution at the particle center and surface. These experimental and simulation results jointly provide strong empirical evidence for applying porous silicon materials as high‐performance anode materials for lithium‐ion batteries and offer essential guidance for future stress analysis and electrode design of porous silicon electrode materials.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Liang Liu
Yichi Zhang
Naishuo Xue
Energy Technology
University of British Columbia
Tsinghua University
Jiangsu University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Liu et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68e615dfb6db6435875a88e3 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ente.202400664
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: