Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract Introduction Although the promotion of healthy working environments to improve the well-being of health care professionals is a growing trend, no study of such a model has been conducted in the field of hospital nursing management. The purpose of this study was to assess the factors that determine nurses’ well-being at work. Methods We performed a cross-sectional study on a sample of nurses at Hedi Chaker hospital of Sfax; Tunisia. We used validated self-reporting instruments: the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), the World Health Organisation- Well-Being Index (WHO-5) and the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS). Results A total of 146 nurses completed the questionnaire. The average age was 32.6 ± 9.5 years. Less than half of nurses (48%) had reduced well-being. A high level of life satisfaction was found in 19.4% of cases. According to the Perceived Stress Scale, the majority (75%) had a high stress score. Significant associations were found between well-being at work and absence of chronic comorbidity (p=0.02), working in a medical department (p=0.00), satisfactory compensatory rest (p=0.01) and high life satisfaction (p=0.02). A high perceived stress score was associated with reduced well-being at work (p=0.001). Discussion These findings indicate that interventions promoting the well-being of nurses should be implemented by improving modifiable predictors such as lifestyle and work-related factors. Conclusion The current findings, while specific to hospital nurses, may have significant implications for a all health care professionals in various fields.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Amel Kchaou
Fériel Dhouib
Nada Kotti
Occupational Medicine
University of Sfax
Hopital Universitaire Hedi Chaker
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Kchaou et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68e6228db6db6435875b464f — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqae023.1137
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: