Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract Introduction Systematically conducted process evaluations of integrated workplace health promotion programs (WHPP) are lacking. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the implementation process of an integrated WHPP. Methods The degree of implementation, perspectives of employers and employees in the working group implementing the integrated WHPP, and contextual barriers and facilitators were evaluated. Data were collected by means of questionnaires, interviews, monitoring charts and observations at 6-10 months follow up. Interviews with employers and employees were recorded, transcribed and analyzed by thematic coding. Results Preliminary results based on two participating organizations showed that the criteria of the integrated approach, i.e. implement activities on both the individual and organizational level for two lifestyle themes, were met by only one location of one organization. Setting up a working group required a lot of time, but eventually it led to working groups with sufficient expertise and a good division of roles. Members of the working group were very motivated and willing to continue, but were limited by their lack of time. Working group members were satisfied with the program materials, specifically the catalogue with an overview of evidence- and/or practice-based health promoting activities. Discussion The mixed methods approach is a strength, as quantitative and qualitative data complement each other. Conclusion Preliminary results show that implementation of an integrated WHPP within six months was challenging. More effort is needed to start up a working group quickly to avoid delays in implementation, assess needs of employees and to create support within the organization.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Denise J. M. Smit
Geneeskundige en Gezondheidsdienst
Sandra Van Oostrom
Josephine Engels
HAN University of Applied Sciences
Occupational Medicine
National Institute for Public Health and the Environment
HAN University of Applied Sciences
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Smit et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/68e6228db6db6435875b486f — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqae023.0701
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: