Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Sampling and chromatography-mass spectrometry methods were investigated to measure atmospheric amines and aminoamides. Amines and their amide derivatives play significant roles in new particle formation (NPF) in the atmosphere, especially diamines and aminoamides have higher NPF potentials compared to monoamines. For amine sampling, silica gel tube collection and formic acid extraction gave good overall recoveries (>93 ± 8%) for mono-, di-, tri-, tetramines, and aminoamides. Two chromatography methods were subjected to analyze the extracted amines. One involved direct analysis using hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography with carboxyl or diol group functioned separation column (carboxyl-HILIC or diol-HILIC), and the other utilized derivatization with 4-(N,N-dimethylaminosulfonyl)-7-fluoro-2,1,3-benzoxadiazole (DBD-F) and subsequent reversed-phase chromatography (HPLC). Separated amines were detected by electrospray ionization and tandem mass spectrometry in both cases. DBD-F-HPLC method provided good sensitivity for mono- and all polyamines (limit of detection (LOD) < 4.6 nM, relative standard deviation (RSD) for 100 nM < 9.2%). However, aminoamides could not be detected by DBD-F-HPLC. Carboxyl-HILIC provided good sensitivities for mono- and diamines and aminoamides (LOD < 1.6 nM, RSD < 4.8%). Forest air measurement was performed and data obtained by carboxyl-HILIC and DBD-F-HPLC showed good agreement for 1,3-diaminopropane, 1,4-diaminobutane (putrescine) and 1,5-diaminopentane (cadaverine) (R
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Kentaro Saeki
Kazuya Ikari
Shin-Ichi Ohira
Analytical Sciences
Kumamoto University
University of the Ryukyus
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Saeki et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68e613c8b6db6435875a6b05 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44211-024-00626-3
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: