Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
e16360 Background: Early detection of PDAC can improve survival but is hampered by the lack of recognizable symptoms in early disease. Imaging has been the mainstay for surveillance of high-risk individuals but has proven to be cumbersome and may lack sensitivity to detect small tumors. CA19-9 is the only available blood biomarker for PDAC, but it is neither sensitive nor specific enough for it to be recommended for high-risk surveillance. A sensitive and specific blood biomarker for PDAC could positively impact this situation. Methods: Serum samples from patients across multiple centers with stage I and II PDAC (n = 75) and matched controls at high risk for PDAC (genetic and familial) (n = 83) were assessed for more than 2,900 protein analytes using O-link multiplex technology and conventional immunoassays for selected protein candidates. Machine learning was used to combine the biomarker candidates to create 4-plex signatures discriminating PDAC and controls. Results: ROC (receiver operating characteristic) curve analysis of these revealed signatures with performance superior to CA19-9 and a previously commercially available assay, IMMRay PanCan-d (AUC of 0.97 and 0.94 vs. 0.87 for CA19-9 and 0.88 for IMMRay). A subset of these candidate biomarkers has now been transitioned to standardized ELISA assays which are being used to construct a final signature for clinical validation in an independent set of PDAC and high-risk control samples. Conclusions: A novel multi-analyte blood test utilizing newly-discovered PDAC biomarkers has the potential to improve early detection of PDAC in high-risk individuals.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Alcibiade Athanasiou
Natasha Kureshi
Norma Alonzo Palma
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Athanasiou et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68e673ffb6db6435875fea63 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2024.42.16_suppl.e16360
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: