Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Prior research concludes that tax-expert auditors facilitate tax aggressiveness. However, these studies examine auditors who also provide non-audit tax services to their clients, creating conflicting incentives. We predict that tax-expert auditors, who do not provide non-audit tax services, reduce tax aggressiveness, because tax aggressiveness imposes costs on them. We test our prediction using Chinese data, allowing us to identify Certified Tax Agents as tax-expert auditors. We find that companies are less tax aggressive when their signatory auditor is a tax-expert who does not provide non-audit tax services. Consistent with a causal relation, a decrease in tax rates, which reduces clients' incentives to be tax aggressive, weakens the effect of tax-expertise on tax aggressiveness. Moreover, tax-expert auditors attenuate the type of tax aggressiveness that results in tax-related misstatements. Overall, by examining auditors who do not provide non-audit tax services, we find that tax-expert auditors curb tax aggressiveness, contrary to prior research.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
DeFond et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68e61deab6db6435875afb64 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2024.101715
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:
Mark L. DeFond
Baolei Qi
Yi Si
Journal of Accounting and Economics
University of Southern California
Xi'an Jiaotong University
Renmin University of China
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...