Both Hamstring and Quadriceps Tendon Autografts Offer Similar Functional Outcomes After Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Patients Aged 50 Years or Older

PURPOSE: To compare the outcomes of hamstring tendon (HT) and quadriceps tendon (QT) autografts for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction in patients aged 50 years or older in terms of patient-reported functional outcomes, graft failure rates, complications, return to sports activity, and sports preference. METHODS: statistic test was used to determine differences in categorical data between groups. RESULTS: The number of patients in the QT and HT groups was 85 and 143, respectively. In the QT and HT groups, the mean age was 54.4 years (range, 50-65 years) and 56.4 years (range, 50-65 years), respectively, and 49% and 51% of patients were men, respectively. The 2 groups did not differ significantly in terms of age, sex, time from injury to surgery, and concomitant injuries. No significant differences in preinjury patient-reported outcome measures, consisting of the Lysholm score, Tegner activity level, and VAS pain score, were found between the 2 groups (P > .05). At the 2-year follow-up, the Lysholm knee score, Tegner activity level, and VAS pain score improved to preinjury levels and no significant differences in preinjury and 2-year follow-up functional scores were noted between the 2 groups (P > .05). Furthermore, at the 2-year follow-up, the Lysholm score and VAS pain score did not show significant differences (P = .390 and P = .131, respectively) between the QT and HT groups. Similarly, no differences in Tegner activity level were observed between the HT and QT groups at the 2-year follow-up. No significant differences in terms of the minimal clinically important difference were detected between the 2 groups for the Lysholm knee score (P = .410) and Tegner activity level (P = .420). The 2 groups did not differ in terms of patients' percentage of sports participation at baseline and at the 2-year follow-up (P > .05). A significant decrease (P = .01) in participation in skiing/snowboarding was reported in the HT group at the 2-year follow-up compared with baseline (116 patients 81% vs 98 patients 69%). No case of graft failure or QT rupture was reported in either group. CONCLUSIONS: Arthroscopic ACL reconstruction using HT or QT autografts in athletically active patients aged 50 years or older provides satisfactory patient-reported functional outcomes and allows recovery of the preinjury level of activity. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective cohort study.