Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
The existence of EFX allocations stands as one of the main challenges in discrete fair division. In this paper, we present a collection of symmetrical results on the existence of EFX notion and its approximate variations. These results pertain to two seemingly distinct valuation settings: the restricted additive valuations and (p, q) -bounded valuations recently introduced by Christodoulou et al. christodoulou2023fair. In a (p, q) -bonuded instance, each good holds relevance (i. e. , has a non-zero marginal value) for at most p agents, and any pair of agents share at most q common relevant goods. The only known guarantees on (p, q) -bounded valuations is that (2, 1) -bounded instances always admit EFX allocations (EC'22) christodoulou2023fair. Here we show that instances with (, 1) -bounded valuations always admit EF2X allocations, and EFX allocations with at most n/2 - 1 discarded goods. These results mirror the existing results for the restricted additive setting akrami2023efx. Moreover, we present (2/2) -EFX allocation algorithms for both the restricted additive and (, 1) -bounded settings. The symmetry of these results suggests that these valuations exhibit symmetric structures. Building on this observation, we conjectured that the (2, ) -bounded and restricted additive setting might admit EFX guarantee. Intriguingly, our investigation confirms this conjecture. We propose a rather complex EFX allocation algorithm for restricted additive valuations when p=2 and q=.
Kaviani et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: