Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract Background Plant phyllosphere microbes are important for the host plant's protection. Plant growth‐promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) and Trichoderma are common biocontrol agents (BCAs) for disease management. Pathogens and BCAs can change the rhizosphere microbial composition; however, the effect of PGPR or Trichoderma on plant phyllosphere microbes, particularly for mesocosms involving the interaction between pathogens and BCAs, is not well known. Methods High‐throughput sequencing was used to identify the phyllosphere bacterial community of common vetch interacting with Colletotrichum spinaciae , two PGPRs ( Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus licheniformis ), and Trichoderma longibrachiatum . We evaluated anthracnose severity, phyllosphere bacteria diversity and composition, and the relationship between the activities of plant defense enzymes and hormonal molecules in plants treated with individual and combined inoculations of PGPRs, Trichoderma , and C. spinaciae . Results PGPR or Trichoderma alone reduced disease severity. Trichoderma reduced the salicylic acid content, PGPR increased the catalase activity in plants, and co‐inoculation of PGPR and Trichoderma decreased the salicylic acid content. Inoculation of PGPR and Trichoderma individually or in combination changed the disease‐associated phyllosphere bacteria, and this effect was related to plant defense enzymes and hormonal molecules. Conclusions We suggest that the plant defense response induced by PGPR and Trichoderma results in the enrichment of a fraction of favorable chloroplastic bacteria, which facilitates plant defense against diseases.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Rui Zhu
Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine
Wei Yan
Chinese Academy of Sciences
Yajie Wang
Sichuan Normal University
Grassland Research
Lanzhou University
Gansu Agricultural University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Zhu et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/68e60bf4b6db64358759ef7a — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/glr2.12081
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: