Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
While preliminary findings indicate that multilingual LLMs exhibit reduced bias compared to monolingual ones, a comprehensive understanding of the effect of multilingual training on bias mitigation, is lacking. This study addresses this gap by systematically training six LLMs of identical size (2.6B parameters) and architecture: five monolingual models (English, German, French, Italian, and Spanish) and one multilingual model trained on an equal distribution of data across these languages, all using publicly available data. To ensure robust evaluation, standard bias benchmarks were automatically translated into the five target languages and verified for both translation quality and bias preservation by human annotators. Our results consistently demonstrate that multilingual training effectively mitigates bias. Moreover, we observe that multilingual models achieve not only lower bias but also superior prediction accuracy when compared to monolingual models with the same amount of training data, model architecture, and size.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Shangrui Nie
Michael Fromm
Charles Welch
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Nie et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68e6118db6db6435875a4652 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2407.05740
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: