Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Adequate and transparent reporting is necessary for critically appraising published research. Yet, ample evidence suggests that the design, conduct, analysis, interpretation, and reporting of oral health research could be greatly improved. Accordingly, the Task Force on Design and Analysis in Oral Health Research-statisticians and trialists from academia and industry-identified the minimum information needed to report and evaluate observational studies and clinical trials in oral health: the OHStat Guidelines. Drafts were circulated to the editors of 85 oral health journals and to Task Force members and sponsors and discussed at a December 2020 workshop attended by 49 researchers. The guidelines were subsequently revised by the Task Force's writing group. The guidelines draw heavily from the Consolidated Standards for Reporting Trials (CONSORT), Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE), and CONSORT harms guidelines and incorporate the SAMPL guidelines for reporting statistics, the CLIP principles for documenting images, and the GRADE indicating the quality of evidence. The guidelines also recommend reporting estimates in clinically meaningful units using confidence intervals, rather than relying on
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Al M. Best
Trudie Lang
Barbara Greenberg
Journal of Dental Research
University of California, San Francisco
Virginia Commonwealth University
New York Medical College
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Best et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68e60785b6db64358759adce — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345241247028
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: