Clinicians’ Perspectives of Activity Monitoring Applications and Facilitators for Lower-Limb Prosthetic Service Provision

ABSTRACT Introduction Clinicians involved in lower-limb prosthetic provision and care do not have an objective method for measuring patients’ real-world prosthesis usage. This results in a poor understanding of the full picture of the patient’s everyday life impacting the reporting of outcome following prosthetic prescriptions. There is need to understand what information from wearable prosthetic monitors would be relevant to clinicians and how that information should be displayed to enable health care professionals to make informed decisions. Moreover, clinicians’ perspectives regarding potential use and application of information from monitoring technologies are important in the development and implementation of this technology to improve evidence-based systems for informed clinical decisions for lower-limb prosthesis users. This study aims to explore clinicians’ experiences and perceptions of information obtained from free-living wearable prosthetic monitors used in clinical practice. Methods Seven clinicians from private practice and academia were recruited to participate in the study. A semistructured interview was held for each participant, which lasted about 30–45 minutes. Data and transcripts were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis method. Results Themes of objectiveness and motivation were identified as specific applications of monitoring technologies. Other themes such as awareness and integration were identified as the facilitators of monitoring technologies for prosthetic care in clinical settings. Clinicians identified frameworks in which these monitoring technologies could be incorporated into the clinic, how they can receive feedback as a multidisciplinary team, and the inclusion within patients’ medical records. Conclusions This information from prosthetic monitoring technologies could potentially change clinical practice in several ways: by improving the clinical assessment process, improving the prescription process, and improving the rehabilitation process. To improve the clinical assessment process, prosthetic monitoring information can provide real-world data of prosthesis user’s utilization, which could be used to quantify patients’ self-reports. To improve the prescription process, prosthetic monitoring information can enable clinicians to see if a patient was actively involved in any form of exercise and support them to position their prescription of components within an activity category for their patients. To improve the rehabilitation process, prosthetic monitoring information can be used to plan goals for patients, to measure the progress of patients, and to check for patients’ compliance. Clinical Relevance Statement The impact of these potential changes in clinical practice can ultimately lead to improved clinical decisions in prosthetic care and creation of an evidence-based system.