Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
In this paper, the driven cavity problem was solved using finite difference scheme in stream function-vorticity formulation. A variable grid is adopted to capture more details and information in the area nearby the wall. The Navier-Stokes equation is rewritten as a particular form suitable to the variable grids. In simulation, Reynolds number is set 100 as an example. The velocity, vorticity and streamline contour are produced by the CFD scheme developed in this paper and then are compared with those by Ghia et. al. (1982) to validate this numerical scheme. It shows that the numerical CFD scheme developed in this paper works very well for both uniform grids and variable grids. The numerical tests with different grids setting show that a) the variable grids have advantages in capturing the reversed flow and separation bubbles produced in the corners associated with a good efficiency, b) the numerical schemes with symmetric and dense grids gives a more accurate solution than those with non-symmetric and sparse grids, and c) both the vorticity and stream function have a better accuracy than velocity.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Zirui Mao (Sun,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/68e60658b6db6435875998bf — DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2407.10093
Zirui Mao
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: