Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Farmland eco-compensation, as a typical payment for ecosystem services scheme, aims to address trade-offs between environmental and developmental objectives. As indispensable eco-compensation supporters, the public’s willingness to pay (WTP) for farmland eco-compensation and the allocation to farmers directly affect ecological safety and sustainable development for farmland. Therefore, this study links the public’s WTP for the farmland eco-compensation to the financial subsidies received by farmers and presents a theoretical framework and research approach that connects stakeholders, applying improved choice experiments for empirical study in the black soil region of northeastern China. The results showed that the public has a positive WTP for the farmland eco-compensation program that improves the area, soil thickness, and organic content expeditiously. The public’s WTP allocation for eco-compensation varies considerably, with the share allocated to farmers in their WTP averaging 46.96%, showing a benchmark for compensation standards. The results revealed the influential relationship between the socioeconomic characteristics of the public with WTP allocation and the preferences for farmland eco-compensation, such as the positive correlation between age with WTP allocation and females’ greater preference for eco-compensation. These findings can provide new perspectives and approaches to exploring sustainable pathways for farmland eco-compensation.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Baoqi Liu
Lishan Xu
Yulin Long
Agriculture
South China Agricultural University
Northeast Agricultural University
Mudanjiang Normal University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Liu et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68e60005b6db64358759356d — DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14071166
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: