Survivor-victim perspectives on the possibility of restorative justice conferencing after sexual assault

Survivor-victim perspectives on the possibility of restorative justice conferencing after sexual assault Many have called to hear directly from the survivor-victim (SV) of sexual violence regarding their wants and needs after enduring this harmful experience. We previously reported on broad SV needs, perceptions of the extent needs are met, and criminal legal system (CLS) experiences. This qualitative study used the same sample (N = 11 CLS utilisers and 10 non-utilisers). After an overview of criminal, civil and restorative justice models, participants viewed a brief presentation on restorative justice conferencing. Following it, all participants were asked about their reactions to restorative justice conferencing. The analytic approach used computer-assisted qualitative data (CAQDA) analysis and ATLAS.ti software. The major finding was that reactions to restorative justice conferencing were mixed and were linked with prior CLS experiences and crime characteristics. A convergence of opinion unfolded wherein initial detractors became more positive about how restorative justice conferencing could help some people, if not themselves. Despite hesitancy or insufficient knowledge to fully endorse restorative justice conferencing as an avenue to improve CLS experience, ultimately all SVs believed it should be an available option. The results have implications for broader education on restorative justice in communities to support implementation of alternative justice options, particularly restorative justice conferencing.