Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
The centrality of the role of election observers in an election is underscored by their tendency for non-partisan and non-interventionist observation. Added to that is their impartial assessment of the whole exercise – as reflected in their post-election reports. If anything, independent international election observers’ reports tend to confer some form of political legitimacy on elected government officials. Nigeria’s 2023 general election cycle was not different as an appreciable number of domestic and foreign election observers participated actively in it. This paper, therefore, sets out to assess how international observers perceived the 2023 general elections, with a view to highlighting key areas that must be kept in focus ahead of the next election cycle in 2027. Drawing from the norm of international election monitoring, the paper argued that the role of international election observers in Nigeria – along with their post-election reports – would remain ceremonial for as long as pseudo-democrats remain in power. Baseline data constituted the primary sources of information for the paper, and analysis was done qualitatively. The paper recommended, among other things, that the international community should (collectively) investigate elections scored low by international observers and thereafter, perpetrators can be sanctioned accordingly. That way, the work of international election observers would cease to be considered actions in futility.
Nwankwo et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: