Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
In this paper, I’ll examine whether we could be justified in attributing consciousness to artificial intelligent systems. First, I’ll give a brief history of the concept of artificial intelligence (AI) and get clear on the terms I’ll be using. Second, I’ll briefly review the kinds of AI programs on offer today, identifying which research program I think provides the best candidate for machine consciousness. Lastly, I’ll consider the three most plausible ways of knowing whether a machine is conscious: (1) an AI demonstrates a sufficient level of organizational similarity to that of a human thinker, (2) an inference to the best explanation, and (3) what I call “punting to panpsychism”, i.e., the idea that if everything is conscious, then we get machine consciousness in AI for free. However, I argue that all three of these methods for attributing machine consciousness are inadequate since they each face serious philosophical problems which I will survey and specifically tailor to each method.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Parker Settecase (Fri,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68e76720b6db6435876dc4a9 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/s2705078524500073
Parker Settecase
Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Consciousness
Palm Beach Atlantic University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...