Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Background/Aim: Laparoscopic anatomical liver resection (LAR) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is technically demanding. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the perioperative and long-term oncological outcomes of LAR and open anatomical liver resection (OAR) for HCC. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 460 consecutive patients who underwent anatomical liver resection as the initial treatment for primary HCC between January 2010 and February 2024. Patients were categorized into the LAR and OAR groups, and surgical outcomes between the groups were compared using 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM). Results: After PSM, the LAR and OAR groups included 100 patients each. The LAR group exhibited significantly less blood loss (80 vs. 436 ml; p<0.0001), lower transfusion rates (0% vs. 12%; p=0.0002), shorter operative time (345 vs. 398 min; p=0.0009), lower postoperative morbidity rates (6% vs. 34%; p<0.0001), and shorter postoperative hospital stay (8 vs. 15 days; p<0.0001) than the OAR group. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates were 97.7%, 96.2%, and 89.7%, respectively, in the LAR group and 98.0%, 92.7%, and 88.4%, respectively, in the OAR group (p=0.5874). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year recurrence-free survival rates were 93.2%, 75.7%, and 60.7%, respectively, in the LAR group and 86.0%, 64.5%, and 59.1%, respectively, in the OAR group (p=0.2314). Conclusion: LAR showed improvements in perioperative complications, reduced postoperative hospital stay, and comparable recurrence-free and overall survival rates with those of OAR. Therefore, LAR for HCC is considered safe, feasible, and oncologically acceptable in selected patients.
Sakai et al. (Fri,) studied this question.