Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
The article is devoted to the analysis of the causes of legal self-organization in sports. The development of sports has set objective tasks for the civil society to organize it. As a result of this significant amount of work, the Olympic Movement was created from the structure of the International Olympic Committee (hereinafter — the IOC), the Olympic Charter was adopted, this movement and the principles of its activities are recognized by the overwhelming majority of countries around the world. Traditional legal regulation in the form of creating models of behavior based on the norms of law is also possible in relation to sports organizations, but it is limited in terms of defining organizational and legal forms, registration procedures and practically does not affect the results of their activities as autonomous civil communities. Attention is drawn to the fact that the relations that develop in sports are heterogeneous, have not the same legal nature, are regulated in different ways, which allows them to be conditionally divided into those that are in the sphere of decisive influence of the methodology of private law and those that are mostly adjacent to public law regulation (you can say “directive”). Therefore, it is important to take into account the existence of an external impact in the form of a) acts of state regulation of relations in sports (public law aspect) and b) internal decisions of the communities of athletes (private law aspect). These areas of regulation are manifested mainly as certain approaches to regulation, characteristic of acquiring relevant rights and (or) defending relevant “interests”.
Murad R. Asadullin (Thu,) studied this question.