Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Mid-Atlantic Native archaeology has focused primarily on cultural horizons that predate the arrival of Europeans, culture contact phenomena, or the frontier dynamic of post-contact. In recent decades, the discipline has made important strides toward civic engagement with Native peoples. However, the focus on pre-contact/contact archaeology and settler history has inhibited the work of decolonization by unconsciously reaffirming colonialist narratives of Native disappearance. From the vantage of the public and present-day communities, several “middle centuries” of Indigenous experiences remain unexplained, and thus, an era of significant culture change is obscured. My call-to-action urges archaeologists to expand the lens of “deep history” across the prehistory/history divide into the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, using historical anthropology to engage an understudied period of Indigenous cultural adaptation and persistence. In this article, I overview four examples of recent applied anthropological research that address these silenced spaces and consider decolonizing practices that align with the needs of Native communities.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Buck Woodard (Fri,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68e5ef86b6db6435875846d0 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/01976931241264511
Buck Woodard
North American Archaeologist
William & Mary
Williams (United States)
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...