Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
BACKGROUND Decision aids improve patient and clinician decision-making but are underused and often restricted to clinical settings. OBJECTIVE Given limited studies analyzing the feasibility of disseminating decision aids through social media, this study aimed to evaluate the acceptability, trust, and engagement of women with social media as a tool to deliver online decision aids for cancer treatment. METHODS To prepare for potential dissemination of a breast cancer decision aid via social media, a cross-sectional survey in February 2023 was conducted via Prime Panels, an online market research platform, of women aged 35-75 years in the United States. Demographics, health, cancer information-seeking behaviors, social media use, trust in social media for health information, as well as the likelihood of viewing cancer-related health information and clicking on decision aids through social media, were assessed. Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics, correlations, and multivariable ordinal regression. RESULTS Of 607 respondents, 397 (65.4%) had searched for cancer information, with 185 (46.6%) using the internet as their primary source. Facebook (Meta) was the most popular platform (511/607, 84.2%). Trust in social media for health information was higher among Black (14/72, 19.4%) and Asian respondents (7/27, 25.9%) than among White respondents (49/480, 10.2%; P=.003). Younger respondents aged 35-39 years (17/82, 20.7%) showed higher trust than those aged 70-79 years (12/70, 17.1%; P.001). Trust in social media for health information was linked to a higher likelihood of viewing cancer information and accessing a decision aid online (P.001). Participants who rated social media as “Trustworthy” (n=73) were more likely to view cancer information (61/73, 83.6%) and click on decision aids (61/73, 83.6%) than those who found it “Untrustworthy” (n=277; view: 133/277, 48.0%; click: 125/277, 45.1%). Engagement with social media positively correlated with viewing online cancer information (Spearman ρ=0.20, P.001) and willingness to use decision aids (ρ=0.21, P.001). Multivariable ordinal regression analyses confirmed that perception of social media’s trustworthiness is a significant predictor of engagement with decision aids (untrustworthy vs trustworthy β=–1.826, P.001; neutral vs trustworthy β=–0.926, P=.007) and of viewing cancer information (untrustworthy vs trustworthy β=–1.680, P.001, neutral vs trustworthy β=–0.581, P=.098), while age and employment status were not significant predictors. CONCLUSIONS This exploratory study suggests that social media platforms may increase access to health information and decision aids. No significant differences were observed between demographic variables and the use or trust in social media for health information. However, trust in social media emerged as a mediating factor between demographics and engagement with cancer information online. Before disseminating decision aids on social media, groups should identify existing trust and engagement patterns with different platforms within their target demographic. CLINICALTRIAL
Johnson et al. (Wed,) studied this question.