Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Background: This study aims to establish whether COVID-19 qualified as a force majeure event or exceptional circumstance according to the laws of the United Arab Emirates (UAE) and assess if a particular principle can circumvent contractual duties. It investigates how COVID-19 impacted administrative contracts in the UAE, using UAE laws and case studies to explore legal theories that justify failure to perform an obligation in such contracts. The UAE, like many other countries, faced an unpredictable event and utilised all its resources and manpower to combat the danger and ensure the safety of its people. This resulted in various restrictions, such as mandatory quarantine for everyone entering the UAE and limitations on travel outside the country. Additionally, certain Emirates within the UAE, such as Abu Dhabi, imposed entry restrictions, requiring a negative COVID-19 test result for entry and later mandating that only vaccinated individuals were permitted to enter. Additionally, the study explores the necessary criteria for demonstrating force majeure or exceptional circumstances in said contracts. This study used an analytical approach to examine laws and court decisions. Based on the findings, the outbreak of COVID-19 did not directly impact administrative contracts in the UAE. This is likely due to the authorities’ effective handling of the situation. Notably, the theories of force majeure and exceptional circumstances could not be automatically and generally applied to all contracts because each contract was unique and required individual considerations. The study presents potential theoretical and practical applications, highlighting opportunities for future research.
Sumaya Abdulrahim Hamdan Nasser Al Jahoori (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: