Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Crowded environments are inherently vulnerable to a range of risks, including earthquakes, fires, violent attacks, and terrorism. In such scenarios, every second counts in an evacuation, as it can significantly impact the number of lives saved. This paper introduces a novel approach to optimising crowd evacuation processes, focusing on behavioural modification rather than traditional methods such as mathematical optimisation models or architectural adjustments. We propose that by altering the behaviours of individuals within a crowd, overall system efficiency can be enhanced from within. We explore the effects of imparting simple, easily understandable strategies or instructions to individuals that can improve evacuation efficiency. The current work concentrates on how modifications in individual decision-making—namely, exit-choice and exit-choice-changing behaviour—can influence evacuation dynamics. We present the results of six major evacuation experiments, encompassing nearly 100 experimental scenarios and repetitions, which specifically investigate the effect of influencing exit choice and adaptation in exit-choice behaviour. The investigation revolves around three core questions: (a) the impact of effective strategies (b) the potential consequences of detrimental strategies, indicative of common misconceptions or poor advice, and (c) the influence of varying levels of strategy adoption, examining how system efficiency changes as more individuals embrace either beneficial or harmful strategies. The findings indicate that behavioural modification can substantially influence evacuation efficiency. Interestingly, the negative impact of poor strategies outweighs the benefits of effective ones. With respect to beneficial strategies, a significant increase in efficiency is observed at initial and intermediate levels of strategy adoption/uptake, suggesting that complete compliance is not necessary to enhance overall system performance. The benefit of influencing decision adaptation behaviour is considerably more tangible than influencing exit choice behaviour. These insights establish a novel perspective in evacuation safety. They lay a foundational framework for developing targeted public education and training programs based on empirical evidence. They highlight the importance of awareness and self-regulation among crowds, showcasing their potential to significantly increase both efficiency and safety in evacuation scenarios, potentially saving lives.
Haghani et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: