Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Background Cardiovascular disease (CVD) and depression have a bidirectional association, with inflammation and metabolic factors being common important triggers for both conditions. However, as a novel inflammatory and metabolic marker, platelet-to-HDL-C ratio (PHR) has not been established in relation to depression and cardiovascular disease. Materials and methods Participants aged 20 years and older were included in the 2005–2018 NHANES database. PHR was calculated as the ratio of platelet count (1000 cells/μL) to HDL-C (mmol/L). The Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) was used to diagnose depression, with a cutoff value of 10. Weighted logistic regression analysis and restricted cubic spline (RCS) analysis were employed to examine the association between PHR and depression-related features. Additionally, weighted COX regression and RCS were used to analyze the association of PHR with CVD mortality in patients with depression. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to assess whether PHR had an advantage over HDL-C in predicting depression. Finally, the mediating role of PHR in the latest cardiovascular health indicator Life’s Essential 8 and depression was explored. Results A total of 26,970 eligible participants were included, including 2,308 individuals with depression, representing approximately 160 million U.S. adults when weighted. After full adjustment, we estimated that the odds ratio (OR) of depression associated with a per standard deviation (SD) increase in PHR was 1.06 (95% CI: 1.01–1.12, P=0.03). The restricted cubic spline (RCS) analysis indicated a linear association (Nonlinear P=0.113). When PHR was divided into four groups based on quartiles and included in the model after full adjustment for depression risk factors, participants in quartile 2, quartile 3, and quartile 4 of PHR showed a trend of increasing risk of depression compared to the lowest quartile group (P trend=0.01). In addition, weighted COX regression and RCS revealed that a per SD increase in PHR was associated with a higher risk of CVD mortality among patients with depression (HR: 1.38, 95% CI: 1.05–1.81, P=0.02, Nonlinear P=0.400). Subgroup analyses showed that current alcohol consumption enhanced the association between PHR and depression (P for interaction=0.017). Furthermore, the areas under the ROC curves (AUC) were 0.556 (95% CI, 0.544–0.568; P 0.001) for PHR and 0.536 (95% CI, 0.524–0.549; P 0.001) for HDL-C (P DeLong = 0.025). Finally, mediation analysis indicated that PHR was an intermediate mechanism between LE8 and depression (mediation proportion=5.02%, P=0.02). Conclusion In U.S. adults, an increase in PHR linearly increases the risk of depression and CVD mortality among individuals with depression. Additionally, PHR has a better predictive advantage for depression compared to HDL-C. Furthermore, PHR significantly mediates the association between LE8 scores and depression.
Zhang et al. (Mon,) studied this question.