Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
The advancement of urban scholarship and the effective addressing of urban environment challenges necessitate the adoption of sophisticated analytical methods. Urban scholars and policymakers need advanced analytical methods to tackle issues like gentrification, housing affordability, and urban sprawl. Predictive models are crucial in the realm of urban sciences, and hyperparameter tuning methods can significantly improve their accuracy and efficiency. Our study compares three such methods Optuna, Random Search, and Grid Search using a housing transaction dataset. We find that Optuna is not only 5.58 to 70.50 times faster than the other two methods when applied to Random Forest and Gradient Boosting Machine algorithms, but also achieves lower error values in key evaluation metrics on the test set, such as mean absolute error, mean squared error, mean absolute percentage error and root mean squared error.
Kee et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: