Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract Collective decision-making is widely observed in natural organisms, especially insects and animals. In this regard, aggregation represents one of the paramount behaviors, as it can be useful for protecting groups against predators or speeding up the foraging process. In the field of autonomous robotics, aggregation is modeled through a series of alternative paradigms, among which evolutionary algorithms are considered a convenient tool. In this work, we compared three modern evolutionary strategies --- CMA-ES, xNES and OpenAI-ES --- for their ability to evolve an aggregation behavior in a swarm of robots. Specifically, we systematically varied the number of agents in the group, the environmental conditions (i.e., the number of target nests) and the parameters tuning the fitness function. Our aim is to verify whether and how the selected methods are effective at addressing the problem. The results we obtained indicate how the OpenAI-ES achieves better performance in all the considered scenarios. Furthermore, it displays qualitatively more interesting strategies than the other two methods.
Pagliuca et al. (Wed,) studied this question.