Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract Over the past decade, business actors, in particular transnational corporations, have been increasingly called to respect human rights and environmental standards in their own operations and in their supply chains. However, the idea of obliging companies to respect human rights throughout their supply chains requires legal changes at international, EU and national levels that have proved hard to achieve. A common explanation for the slow progress in these areas is the strong lobbying of global economic players who successfully obstruct the necessary legal reforms. Conversely, the present contribution aims to show that one of the reasons for the slow progress in adopting the necessary legal reforms is that imposing such obligations on companies may challenge certain traditional legal concepts of international law, as well as the public, civil and criminal laws of many, if not most, countries around the world, and critically examines the response of different legal systems to these legal challenges.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Mateja Steinbrück Platise (Fri,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68e62ea0b6db6435875c0f24 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004705555_012
Mateja Steinbrück Platise
Austrian Review of International and European Law Online
Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: