Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract Introduction Uveal melanoma (UM) is a rare disease with a propensity for liver metastases and a poor prognosis. Isolated hepatic perfusion (IHP) using high-dose melphalan has demonstrated a 40% response rate in patients with liver metastases from UM, while the combination of ipilimumab 3 mg/kg and nivolumab 1 mg/kg (IPI3/NIVO1) yields response rates of 11-18%. However, the impact on overall survival (OS) of combining these treatments is unknown. Method This multicenter, open-label, randomized, controlled phase Ib trial enrolled patients with liver-dominant metastatic UM, randomized to receive either IHP with melphalan 1 mg/kg followed by combination immunotherapy (four cycles of IPI3/NIVO1) (Arm A) or one cycle of IPI3/NIVO1 before IHP followed by three cycles of IPI3/NIVO1 (Arm B). The primary endpoint was safey and has been reported previously, here we present data on overall survival. Result Eighteen patients were included, with 9 in each arm. Seventy-eight percent were treatment-naïve, and 72% had isolated liver metastases. Three patients did not undergo planned IHP. The overall response rate was 38%, with 57% in Arm A and 22% in Arm B, and a median response duration of 11.9 months. At a minimum 18-month follow-up, overall survival was 50%, with 56% in Arm A and 44% in Arm B. Median OS was 18.2 months in Arm A and 17.2 months in Arm B. Discussion The numerically higher response rate in Arm A warrants a randomized study designed to detect differences between IPI/NIVO with or without IHP.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Axel Nelson
Amir Shafazand
Christian Cahlin
British journal of surgery
Uppsala University
University of Gothenburg
The University of Western Australia
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Nelson et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68e5e0f5b6db6435875759ee — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znae175.032