Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Design thinking (DT) is a widely-used innovation approach characterized by its experience-based character. It revolves around creating innovative solutions through extensive interaction among end-users, team members, and other stakeholders. However, traditional on-site, physical DT sessions are increasingly replaced by virtual sessions, potentially undermining the experiential nature of DT. This study examines the effects of changing from a physical to a virtual format on participants' experiences in DT processes as well as the resulting outcomes. To this end, we first identified two established complementary psychological theories—construal level theory and embodied cognition—that provide starting points for understanding the experiences of participants in physical and virtual DT formats. Next, we pursued an exploratory qualitative study by conducting 41 in-depth interviews with DT experts from research and practice. Our findings show that the DT format has profound effects across all phases of the DT process. From a theoretical perspective, we contribute by showing that changing the DT format to a virtual setting affects participants' cognitive experiences during all DT process phases and the respective outcomes. From a managerial perspective, we suggest a roadmap for designing a hybrid DT process that integrates the advantages of both physical and virtual DT formats.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Alice Minet
Daniel Wentzel
RWTH Aachen University
Stefan Raff
Bern University of Applied Sciences
Technological Forecasting and Social Change
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
RWTH Aachen University
Bern University of Applied Sciences
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Minet et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/68e5d8b5b6db64358756e841 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123596
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: