Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
In view of the climate crisis, green technologies should be used to ensure sustainable structures in the construction industry. Road construction could also contribute to the creation of a circular economy, as it is partly responsible for several current environmental phenomena, such as greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and depletion of natural aggregates and landfills. The use of Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement (RAP) is considered one of these recycling solutions, as it can be reused in road construction projects. Implementing it in practice is already a topic that should be included in the technical guidelines for road construction and maintenance. Therefore, this study is a critical overview of the worldwide experiences with the installation of RAP in road pavements published by different road authorities worldwide, aiming to prove the inconsistency in using these materials in pavement courses. The results of this review are analyzed to identify possible knowledge gaps regarding RAP content. It was shown that the use of RAP is different on all five continents. The main findings were that the RAP content in asphalt layers is still at a low level of about 30% and that the use of RAP materials in unbound layers in road pavement construction is not yet fully accepted. It is expected that the results of this study will help to improve further research on the performance of RAP and motivate more countries to develop appropriate guidelines for the use of RAP materials in road pavement construction.
Tsakoumaki et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: