Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract Social justice is widely advanced as a central nursing value, and yet conceptual understandings of social justice remain inconsistent and vague. Further, despite persistently articulated commitments to upholding social justice, the profession of nursing has been implicated in perpetuating inequities in health and health care. In this context, it is essential to establish both conceptual clarity and tangible guidance for nurses in enacting practices to advance social justice—particularly through regulatory, education and accreditation documents that shape the nursing profession. This Foucauldian discourse analysis examines how social justice is discursively positioned within nursing professional documents in Canada, and illustrates that social justice was largely discursively excluded from these texts. Where social justice discourses were invoked, we identified that four central discursive patterns obscured and de‐centred this nursing value: (i) Vague language undermined professional commitments to social justice; (ii) Constructions of knowledge and awareness de‐emphasized practice; (iii) Individualism discourses minimized institutional/professional responsibility; and (iv) Aspirational language obscured present action. Extending from this analysis, we contend that the nursing profession must re‐examine how social justice is understood and articulated, and call for a re‐conceptualization of social justice grounded in nursing practice toward remediating inequities in health and health care.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Allie Slemon
Tessa Wonsiak
Anne‐Renée Delli Colli
Nursing Inquiry
University of British Columbia
Université de Montréal
University of Victoria
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Slemon et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68e5d78ab6db64358756dc02 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/nin.12653
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: