Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Aim To explore the utilization of permanent residential aged care (PRAC), healthcare costs, and mortality for frail compared with non‐frail individuals following their first assessment by an aged care assessment team (ACAT) for a government‐funded home care package. Methods The study involved people aged 65 years and over who completed their first ACAT assessment in 2013 and were followed for up to 36 months. Frail and non‐frail study participants were matched through caliper matching without replacement to adjust for potential unobserved confounders. Poisson regression estimated the impact of frailty on PRAC admission and mortality rates. Healthcare costs, encompassing hospital admissions, emergency department presentations, primary care consultations, and pharmaceutical use, from ACAT assessment to end of follow‐up, PRAC entry or death were summarized monthly by frailty status. Results 13 315 non‐frail controls were matched with up to three frail individuals (52 678 total). Frail individuals experienced higher mortality (incidence rate ratio IRR = 1. 76; 95% confidence interval CI 1. 70–1. 83) and greater likelihood of entering PRAC (IRR = 1. 73; 95% CI 1. 67–1. 79) compared with non‐frail individuals. Total healthcare costs over the 3‐year post‐assessment period for 39 363 frail individuals were 1 277 659 900, compared with expected costs of 885 322 522 had they not been frail. The primary contributor to the mean monthly excess cost per frail individual (mean = 457, SD = 3192) was hospital admissions (345; 75%). Conclusions Frailty is associated with higher rates of mortality and of entering PRAC, and excess costs of frailty are substantial and sustained over time. These findings emphasize the potential economic value of providing home care for older people before they become frail. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2024; 24: 939–947.
Toson et al. (Sun,) studied this question.