Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Artificial intelligence (AI) systems can improve cancer diagnosis, yet their development often relies on subjective histologic features as ground truth for training. Herein, we developed an AI model applied to histologic whole-slide images using CDH1 biallelic mutations, pathognomonic for invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) in breast neoplasms, as ground truth. The model accurately predicted CDH1 biallelic mutations (accuracy = 0.95) and diagnosed ILC (accuracy = 0.96). A total of 74% of samples classified by the AI model as having CDH1 biallelic mutations but lacking these alterations displayed alternative CDH1 inactivating mechanisms, including a deleterious CDH1 fusion gene and noncoding CDH1 genetic alterations. Analysis of internal and external validation cohorts demonstrated 0.95 and 0.89 accuracy for ILC diagnosis, respectively. The latent features of the AI model correlated with human-explainable histopathologic features. Taken together, this study reports the construction of an AI algorithm trained using a genetic rather than histologic ground truth that can robustly classify ILCs and uncover CDH1 inactivating mechanisms, providing the basis for orthogonal ground truth utilization for development of diagnostic AI models applied to whole-slide image. Significance: Genetic alterations linked to strong genotypic-phenotypic correlations can be utilized to develop AI systems applied to pathology that facilitate cancer diagnosis and biologic discoveries.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Fresia Pareja
Higinio Dopeso
Yi Kan Wang
Cancer Research
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
University of Rochester
Columbia University Irving Medical Center
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Pareja et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68e5d358b6db643587569c0e — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.can-24-1322
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: