Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract Phylogenetic regression is a type of generalised least squares (GLS) method that incorporates a modelled covariance matrix based on the evolutionary relationships between species (i.e. phylogenetic relationships). While this method has found widespread use in hypothesis testing via phylogenetic comparative methods, such as phylogenetic ANOVA, its ability to account for non‐linear relationships has received little attention. To address this, here we implement a phylogenetic Kernel Ridge Regression (phyloKRR) method that utilises GLS in a high‐dimensional feature space, employing linear combinations of phylogenetically weighted data to account for non‐linearity. We analysed two biological datasets using the Radial Basis Function and linear kernel function. The first dataset contained morphometric data, while the second dataset comprised discrete trait data and diversification rates as response variable. Hyperparameter tuning of the model was achieved through cross‐validation rounds in the training set. In the tested biological datasets, phyloKRR reduced the error rate (as measured by RMSE) by around 20% compared to linear‐based regression when data did not exhibit linear relationships. In simulated datasets, the error rate decreased almost exponentially with the level of non‐linearity. These results show that introducing kernels into phylogenetic regression analysis presents a novel and promising tool for complementing phylogenetic comparative methods. We have integrated this method into Python package named phyloKRR, which is freely available at: https://github.com/ulises‐rosas/phylokrr .
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Ulises Rosas‐Puchuri
Aintzane Santaquiteria
George Washington University
Sina Khanmohammadi
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
University of California, San Diego
University of Wisconsin–Madison
Scripps Institution of Oceanography
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Rosas‐Puchuri et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/68e5d692b6db64358756c921 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210x.14385