Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract Components created with five‐axis machining show a multi‐scale surface character due to cusps created on the surface and feed and tool marks within the cusps. Therefore, it becomes difficult to incorporate the effects of surface character on fatigue life for such components. In this work, an Forschungskuratorium Maschinenbau (FKM) guideline is adapted to develop a fatigue prediction model which considers cusps as notches and marks within the cusps as surface roughness (characterized by parameter R10z). The assessment uses stresses obtained from an finite element analysis model to predict the fatigue life of components whilst considering stress concentration, stress gradient, mean stress, and surface roughness effects. When cusps are regarded as surface roughness within the conventional FKM approach, fatigue life is considerably underestimated. In comparison, fatigue life predictions that take into consideration the roughness within cusps and treat cusps as stress‐raising notches are closer to experimental life.
Fazili et al. (Mon,) studied this question.