2254 Improving the quality and breadth of advance care planning discussions on gerontology wards in an acute London trust

Abstract Introduction Advance care planning (ACP) offers people the opportunity to plan their future care whilst they have capacity to do so and is supported by national guidance. Decisions regarding future care are more likely to be individualised and holistic when patients and their significant others are involved. This QI project aimed to address this by increasing the frequency of ACP discussions being offered and recorded on gerontology wards in an acute London Trust. Method A multi-professional steering group was established to improve ACP using PDSA methodology. A new ACP toolkit, training programme and electronic flowsheet (within the hospital’s patient record system) were implemented. ACP documentation quality was audited on gerontology wards pre and post implementation (over one to four months respectively). Data was compared using Pearson’s Chi-squared test. Results ACP flowsheets were completed by junior and senior doctors, and clinical nurse specialists in frailty and palliative medicine. The initial audit found disparity between documented topics of ACP conversations, with cardiopulmonary resuscitation recommendations being most discussed. Post implementation, 24 ACP flowsheets were reviewed, showing that more ACP topics were documented where these conversations were had; preferred place of death increased from 24% to 60% (p 0.011); treatment escalation plan increased from 41% to 75% (p 0.014); preferred place of care increased from 59% to 71% (p 0.066). Topics not showing significant improvement in documentation (despite inclusion in the flowsheet) were spiritual needs, information needs and prognostic discussion, broader social needs and what was most important to the patient. Conclusion The implementation of an electronic ACP flowsheet improved documented ACP conversations in some topics, guiding healthcare professionals to deliver care that aligns with peoples’ wishes and preferences. Documented conversations became easier to access, review and audit. Work is still needed to promote ACP conversations being centralised around what matters most to patients.