Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
This article will address the claim that Superstudio works, which were part of the reflections of the 1960s’ and 1970s’ search for a new world order regarding architecture, contrary to the widely held view, present a utopia-driven projective architectural approach, rather than a complete rejection of architectural practice. In this context, the members’ work in various fields, belonging to the period after the dissolution of the group, can be seen as a reflection of the theoretical perspective that they had formed up to that day in practice, rather than as a renunciation or defeat. This assessment, which we will consider on the basis of »the constitutive potential of utopian thinking and imagination«, is intended to be a reference for ongoing debates surrounding the relationship between architectural thought and practice. Finally, in this text, which is constructed from cross-references between the group’s own discourses and various critical architectural discourses, it is proposed that Superstudio should be interpreted as an intellectual manifestation of a projective architectural approach, rather than a mere intellectual approach. Such an assessment not only introduces a new interpretation of the group’s work, but also enables a reconsideration of the concept of »projective« regarding the engagement of theory and practice in architecture.
Hande Tombaz (Wed,) studied this question.