Ending the Debate about the Goal of North Korea’s Nuclear Armament

executive summary: This article examines the debate between two schools of thought on why North Korea has developed and maintained a nuclear arsenal, considers the evidence, and argues that North Korea has developed nuclear weapons with ambitions to pursue a hostile reunification with South Korea. main argumentThere has been a continuous debate in South Korea, and in the U.S. as well, between the following two perspectives: that North Korea developed its nuclear weapons (1) for the reunification of the whole of Korea or (2) for the North Korean regime’s safety. South Korea’s North Korea policies have depended on the perspective of each of its successive political leaders. Based on three areas of evidence, however—North Korea’s excessive nuclear buildup, behavior in denuclearization negotiations with the U.S., and, most of all, recent blatant threats to attack and annex South Korea—it is time to conclude that the goal of North Korea’s nuclear armament is not regime safety. South Korea should prepare for worst-case scenarios based upon the premise that North Korea seeks hostile reunification. policy implications• The U.S. should demonstrate its strong resolve and nuclear deterrence capabilities to convince North Korean leaders that its nuclear umbrella over South Korea will not be subject to intimidation. • The U.S. should consider increasing a more tangible nuclear presence around the Korean Peninsula, for example, by consistently and frequently deploying its ballistic missile submarines near South Korea, as it has already started to do. • If the situation worsens and North Korea becomes more assertive, Washington may want to consider the deployment of a few tactical nuclear bombs to Guam to demonstrate its speedy and assured retaliation capability. • Washington should review the suitability, feasibility, and acceptability of its redeployment of tactical nuclear weapons to South Korea if a North Korean nuclear attack were to become imminent. • The ROK-U.S. Combined Forces Command and the United Nations Command should consider stepping up nuclear deterrence and defense actions to dissuade or deny potential provocations by North Korea. • Washington and Seoul may want to discuss how to increase the potential for emergency nuclear armament without violating South Korea’s nonproliferation policies.