Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Guidelines must be interpreted comprehensively and correctly to standardize the clinical process. However, this process is challenging and requires interpreters to have a medical background and qualifications. In this study, the accuracy of ChatGPT3.5 in answering clinical questions related to the 2019 guidelines for severe acute pancreatitis was evaluated. An observational study was conducted using the 2019 guidelines for severe acute pancreatitis. The study compared the accuracy of ChatGPT3.5 in English versus Chinese and found that it was more accurate in English (71%) than in Chinese (59%) (P value: 0.203). Additionally, the study assessed the accuracy of ChatGPT3.5 in answering short-answer questions versus true/false questions and found that it was more accurate in answering short-answer questions (76%) than in answering true/false questions (60%) (P value: 0.405). For clinicians managing severe acute pancreatitis, ChatGPT3.5 may have potential value. However, it should not be relied upon excessively for clinical decision making.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Jun Qiu
Li Luo
Youlian Zhou
BMC Gastroenterology
First Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu Medical College
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Qiu et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68e5ca68b6db6435875606d7 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-024-03348-y