Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract One of the major issues in international development is how disadvantaged populations mobilize in response to state repression. Whether in the Black Lives Movement or in the 2011 Arab Spring, digital exposures of police abuse have spurred social movements when people took to social media to expose it. Yet, in authoritarian regimes, citizens cannot easily initiate or participate in social movements. In such cases, how do victims of police violence express their dissatisfaction? This study examines this question in contemporary China, where repression of protesters is well documented. Based on a dataset of microblogs—Chinese tweets—documenting 74,415 protest events in the early Xi administration (2013–2016), this study analyzes how ordinary protestors, including migrant workers, peasants, and the urban poor, expose police abuse in social media. A close reading of microblogs documenting 150 randomly sampled events finds that Chinese protestors adopt three distinct narrative types: citizenship, solidarity, and confrontational. An accompanying quantitative analysis of the wider dataset further finds that ordinary protestors frequently expose police abuse online and that mentions of police abuse are closely associated with the above three narratives. Overall, this study contributes to understanding how abused protestors discursively contest authorities in the world’s most powerful authoritarian regime.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Diana Fu
Christian Göbel
Studies in Comparative International Development
University of Toronto
University of Vienna
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Fu et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68e5c84bb6db64358755e56c — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12116-024-09428-0
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: