Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract Introduction The chemotherapy and immunotherapy combination is currently the primary strategy to treat metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy (NCIT) is being intensively investigated for treating locally advanced ESCC. Objective We compared the efficacy and safety of NCIT and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) to treat locally advanced ESCC. Methods We included 214 locally advanced ESCC patients who were administered neoadjuvant therapy from May 2014 to April 2022. The patients were grouped according to two neoadjuvant protocols (NCIT and NCRT) routinely used at our institution. Perioperative findings, pathological results, and survival data were compared between the two groups by conducting unmatched and 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) analyses. Results Following 1:1 PSM analysis of the confounders, 66 patients were allocated to each of the two groups. Time span between neoadjuvant therapy completion and esophagectomy was significantly longer after NCRT than that after NCIT (47.1 ± 13.2 days vs. 34.7 ± 8.8 days; p 0.05)]. The overall incidence of pneumonia, anastomotic leakage, or postoperative complications did not differ significantly between the two groups. The 2‐year cumulative overall survival rates and the 2‐year disease‐free survival rates of the NCIT and NCRT groups were 80.2% and 62.2%, respectively ( p = 0.029) and 70.0% and 50.8%, respectively ( p = 0.023). Conclusion In locally advanced ESCC patients, short‐term survival after NCIT is superior to that after NCRT, with similar perioperative and pathological outcomes.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Xiaofeng Duan
Fangdong Zhao
Xiaobin Shang
Cancer Medicine
Brown University
Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital
Lifespan
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Duan et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68e5dc5db6db643587572358 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.70113