Flow diversion for unruptured MCA bifurcation aneurysms: comparison of p64 classic, p64 MW HPC, and p48 MW HPC flow diverter stents

Background MCA bifurcation aneurysms pose treatment challenges because of the complex hemodynamics at the bifurcation and the risk of rupture. FDS implantation has been controversial and there are only limited reports. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of this treatment strategy using p64 MW HPC and p48 MW HPC FDSs for MCA bifurcation aneurysms, compared with the p64 classic FDS. Materials and methods We retrospectively analyzed our institutional database and identified all patients with saccular, non-ruptured MCA bifurcation aneurysms treated with p64 MW HPC, p48 MW HPC, or p64 classic FDS implantation alone. Aneurysms with implantation of additional devices in the same session, previous treatments, and acutely ruptured and fusiform aneurysms were excluded. Results A total of 79 aneurysms met the inclusion criteria: 23 receiving a p64 MW HPC, 34 receiving a p48 MW HPC, and 22 receiving a p64 classic FDS. The occlusion rate was highest for the p48 MW HPC 2 mm FDS, at 88.9% at FU2, compared with 72.2% for the p64 MW HPC and 70.6% for the p64 classic. The time to aneurysm occlusion was shortest with the p64 MW HPC, at 178.31 days. The highest retreatment rate was observed with the p48 MW HPC 3 mm. Conclusion Treatment of MCA bifurcation aneurysms with a p48 MW HPC 2 mm or p64 MW HPC FDS is a safe and reliable strategy achieving high aneurysm occlusion rates - attributable to their lower porosity in relation to the parent vessel diameter as compared to the p48 MW HPC 3 mm FDS-, with reasonable morbidity and mortality.